Mini-incision for strictly retroperitoneal nephrectomy in living kidney donation vs flank incision.

نویسندگان

  • A A Schnitzbauer
  • M Loss
  • M Hornung
  • G Glockzin
  • L Mantouvalou
  • B Krüger
  • B K Krämer
  • H J Schlitt
  • A Obed
چکیده

BACKGROUND Mini-incision donor nephrectomies (MIDNs) were established during the last decade, as an alternative to traditional open donor nephrectomy (ODN) via flank incision. In this study, we investigated intra-operative and post-operative data on outcome following MIDN in comparison with ODN data. METHODS Data of 70 living kidney donations, performed at the University of Regensburg Medical Center since 1996, were evaluated. Donor operation was performed as either strictly retroperitoneal MIDN (n = 34) or as traditional ODN (n = 36) via flank incision. Total operation time, warm ischaemia time (WIT), perioperative pain-medication usage and creatinine levels as well as length of hospital stay, return to complete enteral nutrition and regular digestion were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS Total operation times were similar in MIDN, n = 34 (132 +/- 26 min) and in ODN, n = 36 (140 +/- 37 min) (P = 0.424). WIT was also similar in both: MIDN (0.9 +/- 0.4 min) and ODN (0.9 +/- 0.4 min) (P = 0.568). The requirement for post-operative opioids in morphine equivalent doses was significantly lower in MIDN (8.4 +/- 16 mg) compared with ODN (44 +/- 57 mg) (P = 0.001). Additional application of non-opioids (metamizole) (MIDN: 4.8 +/- 6.3 g, ODN: 3.4 +/- 3.9 g) and non-steroidal antirheumatic (NSAR) (diclofenac) (MIDN: 322 +/- 361 mg, ODN: 247 +/- 474 mg) revealed no significant differences between the groups. The hospital stay was 4.9 +/- 1.4 days in MIDN which was significantly shorter than that in ODN (9.3 +/- 3.3 days) (P = 0.001). Patients achieved fully independent mobility earlier in MIDN than in ODN (P = 0.934). Start of enteral nutrition with fluids was significantly quicker in MIDN (1.9 +/- 7 h) compared with ODN (12 +/- 13 h) (P = 0.05). Full enteral nutrition was accomplished significantly earlier in MIDN (1.6 +/- 0.8 days) (P = 0.023). Return to normal digestion revealed no significant differences between groups. Serum creatinine levels of all kidney donors were in the normal range (66 +/- 18 micromol/l) one day before nephrectomy, increased on day 1 after surgery (119 micromol/l +/- 31 micromol/l) and were stable on day 3 (115 micromol/l +/- 30 micromol/l) without significant differences. CONCLUSION Strictly, retroperitoneal MIDN in living kidney donation is a fast and safe method for the procurement of a living donor graft, giving the patient a significantly shorter period of recovery, and thus is an attractive and recommendable alternative to traditional ODN procedures.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Laparoendoscopic Single-Site (LESS) Retroperitoneal Radical Nephrectomy in a Patient with Renal Cell Carcinoma Receiving Hemodialysis

We present here the patient undergoing laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) retroperitoneal radical nephrectomy while receiving hemodialysis. An 81-year-old man under hemodialysis for 6 years was incidentally discovered to have two left renal masses with acquired cystic disease of the kidney (ACDK). A 4-cm flank incision for GelPort was made. Three trocars were inserted into the retroperitoneum ...

متن کامل

Comparative and Prospective Analysis of Three Different Approaches for Live-Donor Nephrectomy

PURPOSE Living donor nephrectomy is usually performed by a retroperitoneal flank incision. Due to the significant morbidity and long recovery time for a flank incision, anterior extra peritoneal sub-costal and transperitoneal video-laparoscopic methods have been described for donor nephrectomy. We prospectively compare the long-term results of donors as well as functional recipients submitted t...

متن کامل

Mini-Incision Living Donors Nephrectomy Using Anterior Muscle-Splitting Approach with Hybrid Technique

BACKGROUND Significant morbidity is associated with standard open flank living donor nephrectomy. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is criticized for a steep learning curve and a tendency to avoid the right kidney. The anterior muscle-splitting technique uses principles or advantages of an open extraperitoneal approach with minimal morbidity and the advantageous muscle-splitting (instead of cuttin...

متن کامل

Living kidney donation: a comparison of laparoscopic and conventional open operations.

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy has the potential to lessen the burden placed on live kidney donors. This study describes the first British comparison of donor morbidity and recovery following conventional open donor nephrectomy (ODN) and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN). An initial series of LDN (n=20) was compared to a historical control group of ODN (n=34). Laparoscopic operations were pe...

متن کامل

A randomized clinical trial of living donor nephrectomy: a plea for a differentiated appraisal of mini-open muscle splitting incision and hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

A randomized controlled trial was designed to compare various outcome variables of the retroperitoneal mini-open muscle splitting incision (MSI) technique and the transperitoneal hand-assisted laparoscopic technique (HAL) in performing living donor nephrectomies. Fifty living kidney donors were randomized to MSI or HAL. Primary endpoint was pain experience scored on a visual analogue scale (VAS...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association

دوره 21 10  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2006